In the world of IT recruitment, we often come across two fundamental types of candidates: active and passive. This distinction isn’t just theoretical—it has a real impact on outreach strategies, the speed of the hiring process, and expectations on both sides. If companies fail to recognize this difference, they risk losing top talent, not just due to poor timing but also because of the wrong approach.
A passive candidate is someone who is not actively looking for a new job but remains open to new opportunities. They aren’t actively browsing job boards or applying to roles, but they might be interested if the right offer comes along.
In IT, this type of candidate is quite common—many professionals use networking or occasional job offers to "calibrate" their market value. According to LinkedIn Talent Trends, up to 70% of the global workforce falls into this category—not actively seeking, but willing to listen.
On the other end of the spectrum is the active candidate—someone who is actively searching for a job. They may have already resigned, be in their notice period, or have made the decision to leave soon. These candidates:
A Jobvite study shows that active candidates typically make a decision within 10–14 days of starting their job search. This means that companies with slow hiring processes or overly complex interviews risk losing top talent.
Companies that recognize the difference between passive and active candidates and tailor their approach accordingly will increase hiring success while also improving the candidate experience.
Every candidate is unique, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach. Today, recruitment is more about understanding people than just finding technical skills. The best recruiters know this and adjust their style based on the candidate’s situation.
Flutter has been available for about four years, and we routinely recommend it to clients of SnapStack Solutions. This is due to several advantages, including quick app creation and simultaneous iOS and Android app upgrades. Flutter has seen various updates over the years, and we thought now was a good moment to see if it\’s still a viable programming language for mobile app development in 2022.
Read More90% of spreadsheets contain at least one error, and if you’re in charge of financial forecasting, this one error can cost you a lot. That’s why AI in financial forecasting is the new standard for CFOs and financial institutions in general, as it eliminates the risk of human error.
Read MoreOne more Friday, and once more yours truly Jordan is coming forward with another interesting article for this week. So, is it really a weekend if you don’t start it with one of our blogs? Okay, I am going too far 🙂 however, I really appreciate that you like these types of articles.
Read More